I guess this is the main reason why we all love OpenBSD and an idea and a philosophy (and people) behind this great OS!
- Bogdan > On May 11, 2018, at 6:49 AM, andrew fabbro <and...@fabbro.org> wrote: > > "A statement...was mishandled in the development of some or all > operating-system kernels..." > > I think it's really "some" and the reason it's "some" and not "all" is > OpenBSD. > > On Thu, May 10, 2018 at 9:51 PM, John Long <codeb...@inbox.lv> wrote: > >> On Thu, 2018-05-10 at 18:54 -0600, Theo de Raadt wrote: >>>> Dare I ask what lead to OpenBSD not being affected. >>>> >>>> Sorry if it is a dumb question but since this hit FreeBSD as well I >>>> am >>>> wondering >>>> what OpenBSD did differently. >>>> >>>> Was this caught in an audit? >>>> >>>> I am just curious about causality that kept OpenBSD in the clear of >>>> this one >>>> that made such headlines yesterday. >>> >>> >>> We didn't chase the fad of using every Intel cpu feature. >> >> This goes into the achive! Thank you for the slice of sanity in an >> insane word. >> >> /jl >> >> > > > -- > andrew fabbro > and...@fabbro.org
