Why? if you allow anyone to connect to it anonymously what do you gain by using ssh? sftp (non anonymous) exists for a real reason (secure authenticated-by-ssh file transfer, i.e. particularly to allow up and download...)
If all you want is something "less evil for firewalls" Try using a web server instead - if you really want the connection stream encrypted to an anonymous endpoint use an SSL'ed web server. -Bob * Peter Fraser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-02-03 14:45]: > Since I believe that everyone agrees that ftp is > horrible, particularly for firewalls. How come > there is no equivalent to an anonymous sftp. > -- | | | The ASCII Fork Campaign \|/ against gratuitous use of threads. |