On 08/02/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Quoth Marius Van Deventer - Umzimkulu
> > >
> > > On Wednesday 08 February 2006 04:20, Diana Eichert wrote:
> > > > On Tue, 7 Feb 2006, Miod Vallat wrote:
> > > > > > i think we should rewrite the kernel in java since it
> > > has good support
> > > > > > for threads.
> > > > >
> > > > > Remember we opted for C++ during c2k2 (or was it c2k3),
> > > but not until
> > > > > ddb has proper name demangling code.
> > > > >
> > > > > Miod
> > > >
> > > > I cast a vote for re-writing the kernel in Ruby because of
> > > it's robust
> > > > threads implementation.
> > >
> > > You are misled, Diana.
> > >
> > > The kernel should be written in SNOBOL4.
> > >
> > > --STeve Andre'
> > >
> >
> > Intercal!!!
> >
> It is soooooo comforting to see that this topic is getting the close
> attention it so richly deserves.
>
> Spaghetti code -- at least it looks like lots of threads.
>
>
In the end I think most users don't care what language the kernel is written
in
as long as they can find it in the ports tree.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] cd /usr/ports/
[EMAIL PROTECTED] make search key=kernel
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
When it's in there I might start to use it also.
--
Tony Sarendal - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
IP/Unix
-= The scorpion replied,
"I couldn't help it, it's my nature" =-
