On Feb 13, 2006, at 10:00 PM, Jason Crawford wrote:

Time to write your own program in C instead if the time to invoke
rm is taking too much time.

No point, xargs does what I need it to do, and is much more efficient
than having find execute rm itself. The fewer times you call execve(2)
the better.


One execve is enough? Then rewriting the script into C will save
all execve.  Do you think rm(1) does anything special,
other than remove(3)?

-- Pinski

Reply via email to