what exactly are you trying to achieve, or: why not use azure firewall?

On 26.04.20 17:27, 4642 wrote:
> Hi, I have created a OpenBSD 6.6 VM in the Azures cloud that I plan to use as 
> a Firewall, I had planned on using carp but I can't get it working in Azure 
> so I think I can use an Internal load balancer to achieve my aim of having 
> two redundany OBSD Firewalls in Azure. The problem I have is that the Azure 
> Internal Load Balancer requires a health probe to work. So I create a load 
> balancer health probe and set it to the SSH service on my FW Host and set it 
> to every 5 seconds. I can see the traffic on my FW but the health probe 
> doesn't work and I think it's because the traffic from the Azure discover ip 
> "168.63.129.16" that is doing the probe is coming from within the azure 
> nextwork, hitting my internal nic and then onto the ssh service ? and then 
> finally leaving but on the external interface.
>
> tcpdump -n -e -ttt -i pflog0  -v
> tcpdump: WARNING: snaplen raised from 116 to 160
> tcpdump: listening on pflog0, link-type PFLOG
> Apr 26 15:59:30.082436 rule 1/(match) [uid 0, pid 44293] block out on hvn0: 
> [orig src 10.x.x.36:22, dst 168.63.129.16:54762] 10.x.x.4.65324 > 
> 168.63.129.16.54762: S [bad tcp cksum 9d0b! -> 9e14] 252441079:252441079(0) 
> ack 3958895254 win 16384 <mss 1460,nop,nop,sackOK,nop,wscale 6> (DF) (ttl 64, 
> id 2960, len 52, bad ip cksum 0! -> 52f0)
>
> Rule 1 = block log all
> 168.63.129.16 = Azure Discovery Address
> 10.x.x.4      = My External IP on hvn0
> 10.x.x.36     = My Internal IP on hvn1
>
> I tried changing the state rules to allow the traffic out on the external 
> interface and I thought I had it working earlier today by changing 
> state-policy from if-bound to floating but I can't reproduce that again for 
> some reason...  anyway it didn't seem to work.
> I think I really just need to force the traffic back out the Internal 
> interface but I just don't know how to do that ?
>
> If anyone could help me it would be really appreciated.
> Thanks
>
> Keith

Reply via email to