On 2020-08-24, Claudio Jeker <cje...@diehard.n-r-g.com> wrote: > On Mon, Aug 24, 2020 at 04:36:10PM +0000, Laura Smith wrote: >> *> N 2001:db8:aaaa::/29 2001:db8:aaaa::1111:1 100 100 64512 >> 65500 i >> * N 2001:db8:aaaa::/29 2001:db8:aaaa::2222:2 100 100 65500 >> 65500 i >> >> In this example, both 64512 and 65500 are peers (med=100) but obviously >> 65500 65500 should be the preferred route.
That's not obvious to me. (The behaviour would be the same with the more common localpref setting too). > Now it is a bit strange that an AS is prepending on peering. I wonder why > they do that (is their connection to the IX undersized?). Certainly possible. Maybe ask the peer?
