Would this be adequate? /etc/hostname.vlan101 vlandev em0 vnetid 101
em0 is the physical interface connected to the fiber box, it is then setup to get an IP via DHCP. Does vlan101 need to be addressed in PF in any way or are the rules which currently work for em0 enough? > Sorry for the non-inline text. > > OpenBSD makes this super simple and it is well documented. The flow is to > bring up your physical interface and then use that as a parent for your > pseudo vlan interface. > > man ifconfig > > Move down to the VLAN section and it is well described to provide you with > the options you need. > > Any clarification just yell out. Cheers. > > Sent from my iPhone > > > On 31 May 2024, at 8:15 AM, Martin i...@protonmail.com wrote: > > > > I am currently using a home made router with OpenBSD which is connected > > directly to my ISP's fiber router. The OpenBSD router is setup with a > > fixed IP on the WAN port and I do internal NAT etc. > > > > In about a month a new ISP is going to provide internet via the fiber > > and they are changing the equipment. > > > > What they have told me is that in order to use my own router, the > > router has to support VLAN tagging. > > > > The statement I got was: > > > > "We send traffic out on VLAN 100 so your router needs to be tagged to > > 100. Then all it has to do is to get an IP via DHCP." > > > > I have not done any VLAN stuff before and I am unsure exactly how to do > > this. > > > > Is this possible and how exactly is that done? > > > > Thanks.
