On 2024-06-07, Martin <i...@protonmail.com> wrote: > Are you supposed to "bridge" the vlan with the physical interface?
No. Bridging a vlan with the physical interface used as parent for that vlan makes no sense at all. In some cases you might want to bridge a vlan with a *different* physical interface. > I have: > > $ cat /etc/hostname.em0 > up > > $ cat /etc/hostname.vlan101 > vnetid 101 parent em0 > inet autoconf > up > > In /etc/pf.conf I have replaced em0 with vlan101 for ext_if. > > I get "No route to host" if I try to ping something, etc. > > But if add: > > $ cat /etc/hostname.bridge0 > add vlan101 > add em0 > up > > Then it works. > > Was the bridge part missed in the previous emails about how to use > VLAN-tagging or am I missing something? Seems like whatever you're connecting to is either not sending you vlan tagged packets, or not dealing with vlan tagged packets sent by you. -- Please keep replies on the mailing list.
