I'm sorry, dmesg was not fully copied in the first email. Adding the missing part with the error below:
dwiic0 at pci0 dev 21 function 0 "Intel Core Ultra I2C" rev 0x20: apic 2 int 32 dwiic1 at pci0 dev 21 function 1 "Intel Core Ultra I2C" rev 0x20: apic 2 int 33 "Intel Core Ultra HECI" rev 0x20 at pci0 dev 22 function 0 not configured dwiic2 at pci0 dev 25 function 0 "Intel Core Ultra I2C" rev 0x20: apic 2 int 29 dwiic3 at pci0 dev 25 function 1 "Intel Core Ultra I2C" rev 0x20: apic 2 int 30 ppb4 at pci0 dev 28 function 0 "Intel Core Ultra PCIE" rev 0x20: msi ppb5 at pci0 dev 28 function 5 "Intel Core Ultra PCIE" rev 0x20: msi iwx0 at pci6 dev 0 function 0 "Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX210" rev 0x1a, msix pcib0 at pci0 dev 31 function 0 "Intel Core Ultra eSPI" rev 0x20 azalia0 at pci0 dev 31 function 3 "Intel Core Ultra HD Audio" rev 0x20: msi ichiic0 at pci0 dev 31 function 4 "Intel Core Ultra SMBus" rev 0x20: apic 2 int 18 "Intel Core Ultra SPI" rev 0x20 at pci0 dev 31 function 5 not configured ugen3 at uhub1 port 10 "Intel Bluetooth" rev 2.01/0.00 addr 5 drm:pid0:intel_guc_ct_send *ERROR* [drm] *ERROR* GT0: GUC: CT: Sending action 0x550a failed (0xffffffffffffffc4e) status=0 drm:pid0:intel_gt_init_hw *ERROR* [drm] *ERROR* GT0: Enabling uc failed (-5) drm:pid0:intel_gt_resume *ERROR* [drm] *ERROR* GT0: Failed to initialize GPU, declaring it wedged! inteldrm0: 2880x1920, 32bpp wsdisplay0 at inteldrm0 mux 1: console (std, vt100 emulation), using wskbd1 uhub0 at usb0 configuration 1 interface 0 "Intel xHCI root hub" rev 3.00/1.00 addr 1 uhub1 at usb1 configuration 1 interface 0 "Intel xHCI root hub" rev 3.00/1.00 addr 1 ugen3 at uhub1 port 10 "Intel Bluetooth" rev 2.01/0.00 addr 5 Best, Vitaly On Sat, Apr 11, 2026 at 12:16:56AM +0100, Vitaly Kurin wrote: > Hi everyone, > > I've just installed OpenBSD on my Framework laptop and have issues > with the video. Could anybody help me understand where to look, please? > > This is the output of dmesg | grep -i intel > > bios0: Framework Laptop 13 (Intel Core Ultra Series 1) > cpu0: Intel(R) Core(TM) Ultra 7 165H, 4690.41 MHz, 06-aa-04, patch 00000028 > cpu1: Intel(R) Core(TM) Ultra 7 165H, 4424.12 MHz, 06-aa-04, patch 00000028 > cpu2: Intel(R) Core(TM) Ultra 7 165H, 3870.29 MHz, 06-aa-04, patch 00000028 > cpu3: Intel(R) Core(TM) Ultra 7 165H, 4703.23 MHz, 06-aa-04, patch 00000028 > cpu4: Intel(R) Core(TM) Ultra 7 165H, 4513.94 MHz, 06-aa-04, patch 00000028 > cpu5: Intel(R) Core(TM) Ultra 7 165H, 4255.99 MHz, 06-aa-04, patch 00000028 > cpu6: Intel(R) Core(TM) Ultra 7 165H, 3932.90 MHz, 06-aa-04, patch 00000028 > cpu7: Intel(R) Core(TM) Ultra 7 165H, 3792.35 MHz, 06-aa-04, patch 00000028 > cpu8: Intel(R) Core(TM) Ultra 7 165H, 3673.60 MHz, 06-aa-04, patch 00000028 > cpu9: Intel(R) Core(TM) Ultra 7 165H, 3639.01 MHz, 06-aa-04, patch 00000028 > cpu10: Intel(R) Core(TM) Ultra 7 165H, 3492.26 MHz, 06-aa-04, patch 00000028 > cpu11: Intel(R) Core(TM) Ultra 7 165H, 3456.21 MHz, 06-aa-04, patch 00000028 > cpu12: Intel(R) Core(TM) Ultra 7 165H, 2922.75 MHz, 06-aa-04, patch 00000028 > cpu13: Intel(R) Core(TM) Ultra 7 165H, 2894.18 MHz, 06-aa-04, patch 00000028 > cpu14: Intel(R) Core(TM) Ultra 7 165H, 2794.53 MHz, 06-aa-04, patch 00000028 > cpu15: Intel(R) Core(TM) Ultra 7 165H, 2759.97 MHz, 06-aa-04, patch 00000028 > cpu16: Intel(R) Core(TM) Ultra 7 165H, 2671.23 MHz, 06-aa-04, patch 00000028 > cpu17: Intel(R) Core(TM) Ultra 7 165H, 2594.86 MHz, 06-aa-04, patch 00000028 > cpu18: Intel(R) Core(TM) Ultra 7 165H, 2594.86 MHz, 06-aa-04, patch 00000028 > cpu19: Intel(R) Core(TM) Ultra 7 165H, 2505.27 MHz, 06-aa-04, patch 00000028 > cpu20: Intel(R) Core(TM) Ultra 7 165H, 1586.45 MHz, 06-aa-04, patch 00000028 > cpu21: Intel(R) Core(TM) Ultra 7 165H, 1596.11 MHz, 06-aa-04, patch 00000028 > intelpmc0 at acpi0: PEPD > pchb0 at pci0 dev 0 function 0 "Intel Core Ultra Host" rev 0x04 > inteldrm0 at pci0 dev 2 function 0 "Intel Arc Graphics" rev 0x08 > drm0 at inteldrm0 > inteldrm0: msi, METEORLAKE, gen 12 > "Intel Core Ultra DTT" rev 0x04 at pci0 dev 4 function 0 not configured > ppb0 at pci0 dev 7 function 0 "Intel Core Ultra PCIE" rev 0x10: msi > ppb1 at pci0 dev 7 function 1 "Intel Core Ultra PCIE" rev 0x10: msi > ppb2 at pci0 dev 7 function 2 "Intel Core Ultra PCIE" rev 0x10: msi > ppb3 at pci0 dev 7 function 3 "Intel Core Ultra PCIE" rev 0x10: msi > "Intel Core Ultra GNA" rev 0x20 at pci0 dev 8 function 0 not configured > "Intel Core Ultra PMT" rev 0x01 at pci0 dev 10 function 0 not configured > "Intel Core Ultra NPU" rev 0x04 at pci0 dev 11 function 0 not configured > xhci0 at pci0 dev 13 function 0 "Intel Core Ultra xHCI" rev 0x10: msi, xHCI > 1.20 > uhub0 at usb0 configuration 1 interface 0 "Intel xHCI root hub" rev 3.00/1.00 > addr 1 > "Intel Core Ultra TBT" rev 0x10 at pci0 dev 13 function 2 not configured > "Intel Core Ultra TBT" rev 0x10 at pci0 dev 13 function 3 not configured > xhci1 at pci0 dev 20 function 0 "Intel Core Ultra xHCI" rev 0x20: msi, xHCI > 1.20 > uhub1 at usb1 configuration 1 interface 0 "Intel xHCI root hub" rev 3.00/1.00 > addr 1 > "Intel Core Ultra SRAM" rev 0x20 at pci0 dev 20 function 2 not configured > > Best, > Vitaly > > > On Sat, 17 Jan 2026 14:39:54 +0000 > > Crystal Kolipe <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > On Sat, Jan 17, 2026 at 06:18:30AM -0800, Thomas Frohwein wrote: > > > > cpu0: Intel(R) Core(TM) Ultra 7 155H, 4489.51 MHz, 06-aa-04, patch > > > > 00000025 > > > > > > Do you get good CPU performance out of this system? > > > > > > Your dmesg shows that you have all of the cores enabled, which > > > includes P, E, and LPE cores. > > > > > > Depending on your workload, the OpenBSD scheduler will happily > > > schedule two processes on the LPE cores and leave the others idle. > > > > > > My experience with this CPU model has been that, (at least under > > > OpenBSD), it almost always perfoms better with just the 'P' cores > > > enabled. > > > > I've tried with and with out E/LPE enabled and I've noticed some > > occasional slowness with all cores on. I assume that's what you're > > describing; that the key processes are scheduled on the LPE cores then. > > But I suspect I can compile more efficiently with -j8 (or more) than > > -j6. >
