Hi Stuart, > you don't want to have the same vlan on the same port as both tagged > & untagged. i guess you might want something like this.
that's where I am unsure, but at least mine version and your version work (i had this before I added the tagged option). But isn't it possible then that packets from a different VLAN or untagged packets reach ports they are not supposed to? Or does it never happen because the bridge learns on which port which adress@vid is? Cheers Jochen
