On Tue, Jun 09, 2026 at 01:05:04PM +0200, ptr wrote: > OK understand. Is a hypothetical 1023 still considered too large for this?
1023 routing tables with 5 route each, no big deal. 1023 routing tables with 1.5 Mio routes each on the other hand is quite a big deal. So there is no answer to this question. > Jun 9, 2026, 13:08 by [email protected]: > > > On 2026-06-09, ptr <[email protected]> wrote: > > > >> OK, thanks for the clarification. > >> > >> In my case rdomain IDs are sequentially generated and allocated, so this > >> would be less of an issue with memory pressure. I believe the 255 limit > >> could be on the low end if a larger fleet of nodes is factored in and say > >> each tenant's identical rdomain IDs must potentially exist on every node. > >> > > > > besides memory use, some operations use sequential scans of the various > > rtables present on the system (i.e. at least one per rdomain), and won't > > scale well with a larger number. > > > > > -- :wq Claudio
