On 4/22/06, Bryan Irvine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 4/21/06, Marco Peereboom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > So I really meant SC->LC. > > > > ohhh ok, I'm really familiar with those. I'm almost positive about > those. I'll check on Monday.
I couldn't find any that weren't in use. All I could find were SC->SC. :-/
