On Fri, 5 May 2006, Brett Lymn wrote: > Otto is correct about exploiting a buffer overflow to run code > (certainly veriexec won't stop that trick) but I do wonder if it would > be possible to enforce a restriction that any executable page must be > backed by an on-disk object and how much pain/lossage that would > entail.
It would break trampolines, JDK and any JIT even if it were feasible (I suspect it isn't). -d
