On 2006-05-12 14:37:07 -0700, News Collector wrote: > Nick Holland wrote: > > Thanks Nick I should have said I checked all the "usual suspects". Sorry. > >News Collector wrote: > >>Hello: > >> > >>Where (what) is the canonical site (or book) for PF. > > > >documentation-wise? > Yeah > >that would be the OpenBSD man pages. They are authoritative. When > >things change, they get updated, or people get beaten. In particular, > >see pf.conf(5), pfct.(8), pf(4) and the SEE ALSOs in each. > > > >Beyond that, there are several websites and books. My personal favorite > >website is the OpenBSD website itself, but I may be biased. :) > > > OK what book? I'm a PF users and I used it for non-trivial tasks. So I > all (take with gain of salt) most at the level of many docs. > Also PF is a moving target. I wished (wish is the correct word) all > authoritative document. Give to prefect my PF chops. > > > >>Are there any site where talk about PF is a application (like for OS X). > > > >probably. There's a website for just about everything. > >Talk is cheap. > > OS X has PF, but there's a interface that limits what you can do. They > don't document their interface to it. OS X has lot of fancy way to do > trivial thinks you meant not want done.
Mac OS X have ipfw(8) (actually IPFW2) from FreeBSD. Not PF. And you can, mostly, override the GUI configuration stuff: http://www.macdevcenter.com/lpt/a/5719 Have a nice day Morten -- http://m.mongers.org/weblog/ -- http://flickr.com/photos/morten_liebach/
