On Sat, 20 May 2006, jared r r spiegel wrote:
> On Sat, May 20, 2006 at 11:28:26AM -0400, jared r r spiegel wrote:
> >
> > i have half a mind that says otto@/kili@/ckuthe will come down
> > and cluestick me about why what i am seeing is expected behaviour,
> > but the other half expects this to be not what should be happening.
this looks like a bug,
-Otto
>
> the more i play with this the more it seems like
> i'm just not supposed to be using arrays with integers... :/
>
> (note weird echo output, but the indices are OK )
> ==============
> $ typeset -i F=0
> $ F[1]=1
> $ F[2]=3
> $ F[93]=29389238
> $ echo ${F[*]}
> 8 8 8 29389238
> $ set | grep ^F
> F[0]=0
> F[1]=1
> F[2]=3
> F[93]=29389238
> ==============
>
> and in this one, i'm working on some little dinky functions.
> the "_d[0]" parameter ,, the '0' is different every time i
> run it in a new shell
>
> ====
> function _dectohex {
> typeset -i16 _h=''
> typeset -i10 _d=''
> while [[ $* != "" ]]; do
> _d[++x]=$1
> shift
> done
> set | grep _d
> echo [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> }
>
> _dectohex 99
> ====
>
> in the above, if you get rid of the typeset -i16 line, it
> seems to become sane. i'd like to be sane again too :P
>
> --
>
> jared
>
> [ openbsd 3.9-current GENERIC ( may 1 ) // i386 ]
