On 5/25/06, Diego Giagio <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Lately I've been reading OpenBSD code, both user-level and kernel-level,
and I find it very clean and well organized. I have a concern,
thought: why most applications don't use the 'static' keyword for
functions with internal linkage ? Wouldn't that avoid function
name clashes when developing large programs? See below spamd.c snippet:
void usage(void);
char *grow_obuf(struct con *, int);
int parse_configline(char *);
void parse_configs(void);
how many parse_config functions do you think spamd needs?
