On 5/31/06, Ted Unangst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 5/31/06, Will H. Backman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> While wandering through the usr.bin source tree (not to imply that I am
> qualified to take the journey), I noticed that getopt.c doesn't have a
> license clause in it.
> Anyone know who "david" might be?
> $OpenBSD: getopt.c,v 1.6 2003/07/10 00:06:51 david Exp $
it would be helpful if you mentioned *which* getopt.c. the one in
libc (before it was deleted) certainly did have a license. i also
doubt david wrote the file in question if that's why you're asking.
Well he mentioned the usr.bin source tree, and there is only one
getopt.c file in usr.bin source tree. And he mentioned david because
he's the last one to edit the file according to the $OpenBSD$ RCS Id.
If I recall correctly, not having a license means full Copyright law
is in effect, which means no copying allowed, however getopt.c in
/usr/src/usr.bin/getopt/ doesn't seem to have much of anything except
a call to getopt(3).
Jason
