Hi Brauer and Anders
What is the diference between the actual threading library and rtheads?
I use MySQL 5.0.18 and OpenBSD 3.9 for AMD64 and work fine, and I used
a lot of insert / hour in it, using Innodb tables.
Thanks and Regards,
Julian Bolivar
Henning Brauer wrote:
* Anders J <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-06-20 21:06]:
Hello List.
A customer have a mailserver solution wich must be moved to a new
hardware, today its is running on a old suse 9.2 but i really want to
use OpenBSD if possible.
It uses postfix, cyrus-imap and mysql as the backend for users domain
info, contacts etc. (only 58 named users and 3 domains and several aliases)
My self have experienced mixed issues with MysSQL on OpenBSD and also
read and heard about performance and stability problems with MySQL on
OpenBSD.
So i'm a bit nervous implementing this on OpenBSD (Should i use FreeBSD
instead)?.
Has anyone a positive experience with 3.9+ MySQl
mysql-server-5.0.21.tgz
<ftp://ftp.sunet.se/pub/OpenBSD/3.9/packages/i386/mysql-server-5.0.21.tgz>(or
later)?
let's put some things straight.
I haven't seen stability problems with mysql on OpenBSD in a long time.
not even on sparc64.
Unless you're really pushing the limits, performance is not much of a
problem either. with really extreme load, our threading library
shows why we wanna go for rthreads. for the vast majority of uses out
there, you will not see a difference.
