On Wed, Jul 05, 2006 at 11:19:04PM +0200, Alexander Hall wrote: > Hi, > > I've been trying to find out whether to enable soft updates or not, and > I have not really seen any reason not to, other than that it is not > enabled by default. > > In order not to spread (or consume) FUD, I would like to know if soft > updates are considered reliable and in which situations, if any, soft > updates are specifically recommended or not recommended.
Was the answer in FAQ 14.5 insufficient? :)
