On Mon, Jul 10, 2006 at 08:37:58AM -0500, Jacob Yocom-Piatt wrote:
> ---- Original message ----
> >Date: Mon, 10 Jul 2006 15:07:40 +0200
> >From: Rico Secada <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >Subject: Encrypting e-mails
> >To: misc@openbsd.org
> >
> >Hi
> >
> >I have been looking into encrypting my e-mails and was thinking about GPG
> together with Sylpheed, since I am using Sylpheed.
> >
> >But I am wondering is there another and "stronger" or "better" way than GPG.
> >
> >Any recommendations?
> >
>
> mutt has less calories and will make girls want to have sex with you. maybe
> the
> second part is just advertising hype...
>
> it also has s/mime and gpg capabilities, is text based and does your laundry.
Most of that is advertising not perpetrated by the mutt team itself, but
it does suck less. (Also, see the headers.)
However, that's not the original question.
Joachim
