Hi, The -g flag is not neccesary in rc.conf, when the system receive the proccess add it:
_spamd 25447 0.0 0.4 9172 4268 ?? S 9:07AM 0:00.04 /usr/libexec/spamd -v -G 8:4:864 -g The spamd log include two different entries, the spamassassin daemon (spamd) and spamd openbsd: Jul 13 09:32:56 www2 spamd[25447]: (GREY) 200.xxx.xxx.xxx: [EMAIL PROTECTED]> -> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Jul 13 09:32:56 www2 spamd[25447]: 200.xxx.xxx.xxx: disconnected after 11 seconds. Jul 13 09:33:55 www2 spamd[10775]: whitelisting 200.xxx.xxx.xxx in /var/db/spamd But the messages are not delivered to sendmail after spamd (openbsd) check it. I have a develop machine in my network (without nat to public ip) with a local domain and works like a charm.... How spamd (openbsd) deliver messages to MTA (sendmail)? only by pf rules? Thanks, On Wed, 2006-07-12 at 20:37 -0400, jared r r spiegel wrote: > On Wed, Jul 12, 2006 at 01:44:34PM -0500, Polkan Garcia wrote: > > > > The original idea is, the mail sent to openbsd server is checked by > > spamd and next is sent to sendmail to process it. Now, send messages to > > openbsd's box and works fine (using spamdb output) but does not > > delivered to sendmail (none showing in maillog) > > keep in mind that spamd never acts as an intermediary for the mail > transaction. if traffic is redirected to spamd, it talks to spamd > forever. if you use greylisting and something ascends through greylisting, > spamd puts the IP into the <spamd-white> table so that those hosts > will *not* be redirected to spamd in pf ( by virtue of the host > existing in '<spamd>' == false, and the host being not listed in > '<spamd-white>' > also being == false (because it *is* in spamd-white if it made it through > greylisting)) and thus can fall through to the MTA as allowed by > the rest of the pf ruleset > > > I have only one NIC (em0) and this is my pf rules: > > > > table <spamd> persist > > table <spamd-white> persist > > rdr pass on !lo0 proto tcp from <spamd> to !lo0 port smtp -> lo0 port > > spamd > > rdr pass on !lo0 proto tcp from !<spamd-white> to !lo0 port smtp -> lo0 > > port spamd > > > > You have any idea? > > if the above suggestion is not your problem, maybe you forgot to > pass '-g' to spamd? > > eg: you have 'spamd_grey=YES' in /etc/rc.conf.local but have since > restarted spamd commandline with only the parameters in 'spamd_flags=' > which didn't have '-g' in them because you saw 'spamd_grey=YES' > and didn't remember that all that does is cause /etc/rc to tack on > the '-g' after 'spamd_flags' and doesn't automatically just make > greylisting _happen_ ? > > not like that is anything i have ever personally had happen to me... > > :/ > > if that's not it, i guess add '-v' to spamd, make a /var/log/spamd > file, add: > > --- > !!spamd > *.* /var/log/spamd > !* > --- > > to /etc/syslog.conf; hup syslogd, and see if you get anything > else from the spamd log ( given that you mention nothing in > maillog )
