On Sat, Aug 05, 2006 at 01:42:17PM +0200, Rogier Krieger wrote: > On 8/5/06, Felix Kronlage <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >I think, silent by default with -v for more informations seems more > >appropiate too. > > Would you care to elaborate why you want the default behaviour (notify > on a changed timeout) altered? > > The proposed patch by the OP doesn't cause changes for existing users. > Your suggestion does. Are there that many noisy devices? I'm just > curious. > > Cheers, > > Rogier > > -- > If you don't know where you're going, any road will get you there. > >
My 2 eurocent: http://catb.org/~esr/writings/taoup/html/ch01s06.html#id2878450 If the anchor doesn't work, it's the "Rule of Silence" Tobias
