Breen Ouellette wrote on Wed, Aug 30, 2006 at 08:22:59PM -0600: > This really isn't relevant to OpenBSD,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] $ head -n2 /var/run/dmesg.boot OpenBSD 3.9-stable (GENERIC) #2: Wed Aug 30 16:53:43 CEST 2006 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/src/sys/arch/i386/compile/GENERIC [EMAIL PROTECTED] $ cd /usr/src/sys/dev [EMAIL PROTECTED] $ cvs log > cvs.log 2>&1 [EMAIL PROTECTED] $ grep -ic 'from.*netbsd' cvs.log 2382 [EMAIL PROTECTED] $ cvs log -d \>2001-09-01 > cvs-new.log 2>&1 [EMAIL PROTECTED] $ grep -ic 'from.*netbsd' cvs-new.log 1156 [EMAIL PROTECTED] $ grep -c ^revision cvs-new.log 21719 I'm not quite sure _major_ disruptions to one *BSD are irrelevant to the others. By the way, [EMAIL PROTECTED] $ grep -ic 'from.*freebsd' cvs-new.log 469 [EMAIL PROTECTED] $ grep -ic 'from.*linux' cvs-new.log 90 [EMAIL PROTECTED] $ grep -ic 'netbsd' cvs-new.log 2024 [EMAIL PROTECTED] $ grep -ic 'freebsd' cvs-new.log 784 [EMAIL PROTECTED] $ grep -ic 'linux' cvs-new.log 193 In any case, it would hardly be good news should any other free project fail, whatever may have happened in the past. Even if there is some competition among various projects, one's loss rarely is anybody else's win, when free software is concerned. Ok, i'm not a developer; so i shall go back to lurking now. -- Ingo Schwarze <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Serverbetrieb usta.de / studis.de