Stuart Henderson wrote: > On 2006/09/06 13:19, Cedric Brisseau wrote: >> I think spamd can't help a lot since mails aren't received directly. > > oh, what do you mean by "aren't received directly"? > >
I think he means, the mail are fetched from their provider with a mechanism similar to fetchmail and their provider also have a spam filter (and putthe keyword spam in the subject). So what you can do if this is the case, use fetchmail to fetch the mails feed the mails in a MTA (Postfix, sendmail) they can send them to a content filter (amavis with clamav and spamassassin for example) and after that, the mails are send to your MS-Crap. If you have time you can also build a mechanism to feed spam (and probably ham) to your content filter to train the content filter. But don't forget to tell your boss and colleagues that there is no 100% protection for spam ;-) guido
