if you want to be taken seriously, maybe you should change your e-mail address to something that isn't offensive to everyone who receives your e-mails, in this case, several thousand people.
You're just asking to be misunderstood. People misunderstand, and you wonder why. why don't you grow up? <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> is funny to a 12-year-old. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > Chris Zakelj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Adam wrote: > > > Chris Zakelj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > >>> He said "good and secure". Phpbb is neither. > > >>> > > >> Perhaps you would like to offer an alternative > > >> > > > Nope. > > > > > Then you are a useless troll. > > Or maybe I just don't happen to have an opinion on what is a good forum, > I just know that phpBB is a giant pile of crap. > > > This will be my last reply to your filth. > > Yet another setback in my lifelong dream to get stupid emails from > idiots who love to be offended by everything. I am going to cry. > > > You did exactly that by attacking Jack's reply and not offering a > > superior alternative. > > I attacked nothing. I stated two simple facts. > > > Eleven patches in 26 months, or 0.4 patches/month. How does that > > compare to your typical Linux distro, or the typical corporate > > environment? > > A forum is a very simple problem to solve. If a forum has had 11 > vulnerabilities EVER, then it is crap. This isn't an OS, or some > large complex software. Its very simple and straightforward. And 11 > patches doesn't mean 11 exploits, often multiple exploits are released > by the same person at the same time and fixed in one patch. And all > this is with their new security focused development. > > > How many patches has MSFT released in that timespan? > > I'm not aware of any patches for MSBB. Oh wait, MS has no forum > software. Even you must realize comparing windows to a PHP script is > moronic. > > Adam
