Hello,
I think the real question is : is there allways a backward compatibility
of system calls accross patching ? ...
I thinks this is mostly de case....
--
Frangois Visconte
Jason Dixon wrote:
On Sep 20, 2006, at 8:10 PM, Patsy wrote:
On Wed, 20 Sep 2006, John Costello wrote:
This is in regards to a 3.9 system that I installed and am patching.
After rebuilding the kernel (patches 007 and 009), is it ,
unnecessary,
necessary, advised, or imperative to rebuild userland (FAQ 5.3.5)?
Thanks,
Imperative.
Your programs might work, but they might not, or they might work
unpredictably. The kernel, userland (and ports for that matter) are all
intended to be kept in sync, not half -stable and half -release, so
if you
have a -stable kernel, you should have a -stable userland as well. i.e.
yes, rebuild your userland.
The OP is referring to the patch branch, not -stable. The only time
rebuilding userland is necessary after a kernel errata is when the
errata claims it is necessary.
--
Jason Dixon
DixonGroup Consulting
http://www.dixongroup.net
