Will H. Backman wrote: > Henning Brauer wrote: >> * Greg Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-09-26 22:36]: >> >>> Having just done it with "make install" for the first time, I'd always >>> copied and moved it manually, it looks like it saves the previous >>> kernel as /obsd. >>> >> >> it actually replaces the kernel atomically by doing >> >> mv /path/to/new/bsd /nbsd && rm /obsd && ln bsd obsd && mv nbsd bsd >> >> so even when the power goes out somewhere in between, you always have a >> valid /bsd. >> >> > Should all documentation suggest the "make install", or is there a > reason that the docs for following stable show a different way of doing it?
Actually, the redundant build instructions should probably be removed from here and other places, and send people to faq5 and release(8). No point in redundant docs that don't stay in sync. Nick. (ever adding to the list...)
