If you update your kernel to -stable, you must also update your userland binaries to -stable, and your ports tree. When running -stable you don't need the patches, since the patches are applied against -release and are already incorporated into -stable.
Basically, choose one. Either run -release and patches, or run -stable and don't patch. You've already upgraded your kernel to -stable so it's simpler for you to completely ignore patches and finish upgrading to -stable. Federico Giannici wrote: > Joel Goguen wrote: >> Don't patch. Start with an empty /usr/src/ and extract fresh archives, >> then update them to -stable and recompile *ALL* userland binaries. >> These pages are your friend for this: > > OK, I can do it, but then why the patches exist if I HAVE to use -stable??? > > I extracted a fresh -release tree and applied the patch, following all > the steps. Why it shouldn't work??? > > Thanks. > > >> http://www.openbsd.org/anoncvs.html >> http://www.openbsd.org/stable.html >> >> Federico Giannici wrote: >>> Federico Giannici wrote: >>>> Darrin Chandler wrote: >>>>> On Sat, Nov 11, 2006 at 04:25:29PM +0100, Federico Giannici wrote: >>>>>> I have written that I upgraded to -stable the KERNEL (src/sys) and >>>>>> compiled a new one. >>>>> Good. Then you should have compiled userland as well and forgotten >>>>> about >>>>> the patching process, since you already had the patch as part of >>>>> -stable. >>>>> >>>>>> THEN I extracted the src.tar.gz archive, patched it with >>>>>> "002_openssl.patch", and note that the patch SUCCEDED. >>>>> So you moved your source back to -release and the patch applied. >>>>> Moving >>>>> back to -release sources on a -stable system isn't a good idea. >>>> Humm... >>>> So you are saying that it's not possible compile a portion of a >>>> patched userland with sources of a -stable kernel? >>> I restarted from an empty "/usr/src" and the error occurred again! >>> >>> Here are the steps I have done: >>> >>> cd /usr/src >>> tar xvzf /usr/local/storage/openbsd/40/src.tar.gz >>> tar xvzf /usr/local/storage/openbsd/40/sys.tar.gz >>> patch -p0 < /usr/local/storage/openbsd/40/002_openssl.patch >>> cd lib/libssl >>> make obj >>> make depend >>> make includes >>> make >>> >>> And this is the output: >>> >>> ===> crypto >>> cc -O2 -pipe -g -DL_ENDIAN -DDSO_DLFCN -DHAVE_DLFCN_H -DOPENSSL_NO_IDEA >>> -DTERMIOS -DANSI_SOURCE -DNO_ERR -DOPENSSL_NO_ASM -DOPENSSL_NO_RC5 >>> -DOPENSSL_NO_KRB5 -DOPENSSL_NO_MDC2 -DNO_WINDOWS_BRAINDEATH >>> -DOPENSSL_NO_HW_CSWIFT -DOPENSSL_NO_HW_NCIPHER -DOPENSSL_NO_HW_ATALLA >>> -DOPENSSL_NO_HW_NURON -DOPENSSL_NO_HW_UBSEC -DOPENSSL_NO_HW_AEP >>> -DOPENSSL_NO_HW_SUREWARE -DOPENSSL_NO_HW_4758_CCA >>> -I/usr/src/lib/libssl/crypto/../src >>> -I/usr/src/lib/libssl/crypto/../src/crypto >>> -I/usr/src/lib/libssl/crypto/obj -c >>> /usr/src/lib/libssl/src/crypto/rsa/rsa_eay.c -o rsa_eay.o >>> cc -O2 -pipe -g -DL_ENDIAN -DDSO_DLFCN -DHAVE_DLFCN_H -DOPENSSL_NO_IDEA >>> -DTERMIOS -DANSI_SOURCE -DNO_ERR -DOPENSSL_NO_ASM -DOPENSSL_NO_RC5 >>> -DOPENSSL_NO_KRB5 -DOPENSSL_NO_MDC2 -DNO_WINDOWS_BRAINDEATH >>> -DOPENSSL_NO_HW_CSWIFT -DOPENSSL_NO_HW_NCIPHER -DOPENSSL_NO_HW_ATALLA >>> -DOPENSSL_NO_HW_NURON -DOPENSSL_NO_HW_UBSEC -DOPENSSL_NO_HW_AEP >>> -DOPENSSL_NO_HW_SUREWARE -DOPENSSL_NO_HW_4758_CCA >>> -I/usr/src/lib/libssl/crypto/../src >>> -I/usr/src/lib/libssl/crypto/../src/crypto >>> -I/usr/src/lib/libssl/crypto/obj -c >>> /usr/src/lib/libssl/src/crypto/rsa/rsa_err.c -o rsa_err.o >>> cc -O2 -pipe -g -DL_ENDIAN -DDSO_DLFCN -DHAVE_DLFCN_H -DOPENSSL_NO_IDEA >>> -DTERMIOS -DANSI_SOURCE -DNO_ERR -DOPENSSL_NO_ASM -DOPENSSL_NO_RC5 >>> -DOPENSSL_NO_KRB5 -DOPENSSL_NO_MDC2 -DNO_WINDOWS_BRAINDEATH >>> -DOPENSSL_NO_HW_CSWIFT -DOPENSSL_NO_HW_NCIPHER -DOPENSSL_NO_HW_ATALLA >>> -DOPENSSL_NO_HW_NURON -DOPENSSL_NO_HW_UBSEC -DOPENSSL_NO_HW_AEP >>> -DOPENSSL_NO_HW_SUREWARE -DOPENSSL_NO_HW_4758_CCA >>> -I/usr/src/lib/libssl/crypto/../src >>> -I/usr/src/lib/libssl/crypto/../src/crypto >>> -I/usr/src/lib/libssl/crypto/obj -c >>> /usr/src/lib/libssl/src/crypto/rsa/rsa_x931.c -o rsa_x931.o >>> /usr/src/lib/libssl/src/crypto/rsa/rsa_x931.c: In function >>> `RSA_X931_hash_id': >>> /usr/src/lib/libssl/src/crypto/rsa/rsa_x931.c:165: error: `NID_sha256' >>> undeclared (first use in this function) >>> /usr/src/lib/libssl/src/crypto/rsa/rsa_x931.c:165: error: (Each >>> undeclared identifier is reported only once >>> /usr/src/lib/libssl/src/crypto/rsa/rsa_x931.c:165: error: for each >>> function it appears in.) >>> /usr/src/lib/libssl/src/crypto/rsa/rsa_x931.c:168: error: `NID_sha384' >>> undeclared (first use in this function) >>> /usr/src/lib/libssl/src/crypto/rsa/rsa_x931.c:171: error: `NID_sha512' >>> undeclared (first use in this function) >>> *** Error code 1 >>> >>> Stop in /usr/src/lib/libssl/crypto. >>> *** Error code 1 >>> >>> Stop in /usr/src/lib/libssl. >>> >>> >>> >>> Where is the mistake? >>> >>> Thanks. >>> >> >> > > -- Joel Goguen Bachelor of Computer Science III University of New Brunswick http://iapetus.dyndns.org/
