On Thu, 11 Jan 2007 11:52:30 -0700, Stephen Schaff wrote: >Just for the archives... >I went through these emails again, and discovered that this one was >the one that solved my problem. Indeed the default pf.conf file says >"rdr pass on" for the spamd redirects, and Chris asks why pass there? >I removed the word "pass" - now it all works like magic. > >Thanks Chris! > >Stephen > > >On 8-Jan-07, at 9:41 PM, Chris Kuethe wrote: > >> On 1/8/07, Stephen Schaff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> rdr pass on $ext_if proto tcp from <spamd> to port smtp \ >>> -> 127.0.0.1 port spamd >>> rdr pass on $ext_if proto tcp from !<spamd-white> to port smtp \ >>> -> 127.0.0.1 port spamd >> >> why pass there? >>
I have been running with the defaults (including pass) for well over a year. I also suspect that if the "pass" caused problems you would have heard about it long ago and, knowing how well the devs leap onto bugs, the default pf.conf would have been amended pretty quickly. There must be some other reason for your problem and I cannot see what else you have that may cause it. Perhaps Daniel might guess it if you asked on the pf list and showed your complete pf.conf. Rod/ >From the land "down under": Australia. Do we look <umop apisdn> from up over?
