"Stephan A. Rickauer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I did read your FAQ but I can't see how it rebuts what has just been > said. You seem to be happy with signing NDAs. If the result is a > readable and understandable GPL'ed driver, companies will be even less > motivated to release programming documentation. This will lead to a > GPL-lock-in since you simply replace the vendor not willing to share > specifications with an NDA'ed GPL developer not willing to share those, > but GPL code only.
Which is exactly what the GPL people want since that's the whole point of the license. Otherwise they wouldn't be using the GPL. Duh. //art
