I recently installed squid (squid-2.5.STABLE13-transparent-snmp) from
packages on openbsd 4.0 -release -stable. My squid only uses 29M.
15707 _squid 2 0 27M 29M sleep poll 12:38 0.98% squid
This top 'snapshot' has been taken at a peak moment. We have a 10Mbit/s
internet connection and when using squid, no slow performance. I do not
use the cache option of squid (just wanna log everything for now).
So it might not be that strange for Squid to take 90M. When you disable
squid, do you still have poor performance? When you disable the cache,
do you still have poor performance? What is your definition of poor
performance and how did you establish a baseline?
Dmesg partial:
OpenBSD 4.0 (GENERIC) #1107: Sat Sep 16 19:15:58 MDT 2006
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/src/sys/arch/i386/compile/GENERIC
cpu0: Intel Pentium III ("GenuineIntel" 686-class) 1 GHz
cpu0:
FPU,V86,DE,PSE,TSC,MSR,PAE,MCE,CX8,APIC,SEP,MTRR,PGE,MCA,CMOV,PAT,PSE36,
MMX,FXSR,SSE
real mem = 1072914432 (1047768K)
avail mem = 970698752 (947948K)
Nils
-----Original Message-----
Hi,
i have a openbsd 4 box with squid-transparent.
it seems like it have poors performance. investigating with `top' i
saw squid using only 90M of ram, why?
How can i use better my box resource? (Xeon CPU with 4GB of ram)
top:
PID USERNAME PRI NICE SIZE RES STATE WAIT TIME CPU
COMMAND
27010 _squid 2 0 87M 90M sleep poll 9:01 0.05% squid
--
Cris, member of G.U.F.I
Italian FreeBSD User Group
http://www.gufi.org/
=============================================================================
====================
A disclaimer applies to this email and any attachments.
Refer to http://www.sparkholland.com/emaildisclaimer for the full text of this
disclaimer.
