Is it really that hard to cc to security-anoounce? Jeez...
2007/3/17, Ray Percival <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
On Mar 16, 2007, at 5:43 PM, fonkprop wrote: > Yet again, we see that although Theo is willing to beg, wheedle and > threaten > his user community into sending him money when he needs it, he > holds them in > too much contempt to respond to simple, uncontroversial and valid > criticism. No. This is pure bullshit. There was a hole. The patch and the errata had been up for -ages-. Anybody who really cares and really pays attention had patched and been happy for nearly a week. The logic behind the misc posting is so very obvious that to bitch about it is just finding something to complain about. I, of course, don't know the exact numbers but it seems pretty clear that misc has a much larger subscriber base than security-announce. Given that it just makes sense to post this to the list where the most people are going to see it. As for the rest of your rant. It's clear you've never been a working admin or coder. Try it for a while and come back when you've seen the elephant. > > <snip>
-- Please avoid sending me Word or PowerPoint attachments. See http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/no-word-attachments.html
