Here is the output:
$ ifconfig -a
lo0: flags=8049<UP,LOOPBACK,RUNNING,MULTICAST> mtu 33224
groups: lo
inet 127.0.0.1 netmask 0xff000000
inet6 ::1 prefixlen 128
inet6 fe80::1%lo0 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x7
sis0: flags=8843<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST> mtu 1500
lladdr 00:00:24:c7:31:20
media: Ethernet 100baseTX (100baseTX full-duplex)
status: active
inet 10.0.0.1 netmask 0xffffff00 broadcast 10.0.0.255
inet6 fe80::200:24ff:fec7:3120%sis0 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x1
sis1: flags=8843<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST> mtu 1500
lladdr 00:00:24:c7:31:21
media: Ethernet 100baseTX (none)
status: no carrier
inet 10.0.1.1 netmask 0xffffff00 broadcast 10.0.1.255
inet6 fe80::200:24ff:fec7:3121%sis1 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x2
sis2: flags=8843<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST> mtu 1500
lladdr 00:00:24:c7:31:22
media: Ethernet 100baseTX (none)
status: no carrier
inet 10.0.2.1 netmask 0xffffff00 broadcast 10.0.2.255
inet6 fe80::200:24ff:fec7:3122%sis2 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x3
pflog0: flags=141<UP,RUNNING,PROMISC> mtu 33224
pfsync0: flags=0<> mtu 1460
groups: carp
enc0: flags=0<> mtu 1536
pppoe0: flags=8851<UP,POINTOPOINT,RUNNING,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST> mtu 1492
dev: sis0 state: session
sid: 0xdda5 PADI retries: 0 PADR retries: 0 time: 2d 21:08:21
sppp: phase network authproto pap authname "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
groups: pppoe egress
inet6 fe80::200:24ff:fec7:3120%pppoe0 -> prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x8
inet 201.78.27.251 --> 0.0.0.1 netmask 0xffffffff
$
So, this is! What i am doing wrong ?
On 3/19/07, Otto Moerbeek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Mon, 19 Mar 2007, Gustavo Rios wrote:
> Ok,
>
> Here is my output of netstat:
> $ netstat -m
> 331 mbufs in use:
> 326 mbufs allocated to data
> 2 mbufs allocated to packet headers
> 3 mbufs allocated to socket names and addresses
> 72/152/6144 mbuf clusters in use (current/peak/max)
> 420 Kbytes allocated to network (53% in use)
> 0 requests for memory denied
> 0 requests for memory delayed
> 0 calls to protocol drain routines
> $
>
> But rusers still gives that warning message, as also rup:
> $ rusers
> rusers: can't send broadcast packet: No buffer space available
> $ rup
> rup: RPC: Unable to send
> $
>
> How could i fix it?
This is more probably a case of a funky network interface config than a
real mbuf shortage. Check your ip's, netmasks and broadcasts addresses.
-Otto
>
> On 3/19/07, Darren Spruell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On 3/19/07, Gustavo Rios <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Dear list members,
> > >
> > > how could i adjust my mbuf size? Need i to compile a news kernel ?
> > >
> >
> > kern.maxclusters allows setting new limits for mbufs.
> >
> > This would supposedly go out with the same tuning warnings as usual;
> > you may find you need a very good reason to adjust that, if it should
> > be adjusted at all. Does 'netstat -m' show that you're hitting limits?
> >
> > This advice may apply to your situation as well:
> >
> > http://archives.neohapsis.com/archives/openbsd/2004-07/1783.html
> >
> > DS
