On 31/03/07 10:26, Ted Unangst wrote: > >472 bytes. Shouldn't it be fixed? Why does this happens? I tought stack > >gap couldn't influence relative placement of variables in stack frames. > > you should look at the alignment of the variables each run.
So variables could be aligned differently each run even though stack gap is 8-byte aligned. And the system doesn't align at 8-bytes data between stack frames, or am I missing something? Thanks, Gufo
