ral(4) because it's better supported.
On 4/4/07, Nick ! <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 4/4/07, Vincent GROSS <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> 1) what is the R.E. level of ath(4) ? fully understood, mainly understood ?
>
> 2) Is Atheros still reluctant to disclose documentation for its chips ?
>
> 3) If 1)=fully and 2)=reluctant, what should I pick between ath(4) and ral(4)
?
ral(4). I have ath(4) because I got it from a big box store, but I'm
ashamed. Don't support stupid vendors, give your money elsewhere.
-Nick
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED], joy2share.com, vrajamarii.net, ispot.ro}
