On Tue, 10 Apr 2007 11:29:17 -0700 Bryan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I am exceedingly sorry. I realize now that it was not Rico's fault. > My venom was uncalled for... > > Again, sorry Rico, et al...
Apology accepted :-) > back to the shadows... > > On 4/10/07, Jeremy Huiskamp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > If you'd bothered to inspect the headers you would have noticed that > > the below message was sent before the one that has many replies but > > it didn't arrive until about 20 hours after it was sent. Probably > > stuck in the pipes somewhere, that seems to happen with misc@ alot. > > Rico probably figured it was lost and so he sent another which is > > fairly reasonable. > > > > Jeremy > > > > On 10-Apr-07, at 12:44 PM, Bryan wrote: > > > > > Why post twice? Sending it as different person within 24 hours of one > > > another is not going to get what you want... A couple of people gave > > > you solutions, choose one, or move to Linux... > > > > > > Remember this??? > > > "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > to misc@openbsd.org > > > date Apr 9, 2007 4:43 PM > > > subject Binary kernel and base update > > > mailed-by openbsd.org > > > > > > Hi all. > > > > > > I have noticed that the OpenBSD team puts a lot of emphasis on > > > using binary > > > packets rather than building from ports, which I think IMHO is > > > good, but why > > > is it that there is no binary kernel updates, rather than patching > > > the kernel > > > from source? > > > > > > I am asking this not from a point that we find this difficult, > > > rather in > > > OpenBSD its really easy. But sometimes its very time consuming, and > > > yes there > > > exists binpatch and other solutions, but why isn't there an official > > > OpenBSD way? > > > > > > Last week management decided to go back to using Debian on some of > > > our servers > > > due to them being easy to upgrade including kernel and basesystem > > > upgrades. > > > > > > OpenBSD has really made a cool solution with pkg_add -u, but why > > > not kernel > > > and basesystem binary updates as well? > > > > > > Best and kind regards. > > > > > > Rico > > > > > > On 4/9/07, Rico Secada <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >> Hi all. > > >> > > >> I have noticed that the OpenBSD team puts a lot of emphasis on > > >> using binary packets rather than building from ports, which I > > >> think IMHO is good, but why is it that there is no binary kernel > > >> updates, rather than patching the kernel from source? > > >> > > >> I am asking this not from a point that we find this difficult, > > >> rather in OpenBSD its really easy. But sometimes its very time > > >> consuming, and yes there exists binpatch and other solutions, but > > >> why isn't there an official OpenBSD way? > > >> > > >> Last week management decided to go back to using Debian on some of > > >> our servers due to them being easy to upgrade including kernel and > > >> basesystem upgrades. > > >> > > >> OpenBSD has really made a cool solution with pkg_add -u, but why > > >> not kernel and basesystem binary updates as well? > > >> > > >> Best and kind regards. > > >> > > >> Rico
