Yes, the upgrading to 4.1 page mentions this. -Bob
* Frank Bax <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-04-20 12:43]: > Is there a place that documents the spamd differences from 4.0 to 4.1; or > am I left with detecting the differences in documentation? I see 41.htm > mentions greylist sync which I won't need (although I could see a one-time > use when migrating boxes); greytrapping sounds interesting, might try that > (it's in man spamd). What's "noticing out of order MX use" - just a log > entry? Are there any changes to existing functionality to be forewarned > about; or just new features? > > I'm actually running a February snapshot (early 4.1 beta) if that makes a > difference; this is considered "living on the edge" for me. > > > > At 12:59 PM 4/20/07, Bob Beck wrote: > > > Thanks. 4.1 has some major changes too, so bear in mind > >spamd wise it's a big change from 4.0 > > > > -Bob > > > > > >* Frank Bax <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-04-20 08:29]: > >> I'm finally upgrading from 3.5 to 4.0! I use the whitelist from > >puremagic > >> and in the past 2.5 years I have also added another 10 ip addresses to > >> spamd whitelist because of problems with mail getting through. This > >week I > >> did tests on 3 of those ip addresses and we are 3/3 for current spamd > >> accepting connections without whitelist. Great job! I've also done some > >> practice runs with in-place upgrades to snapshot; and plan to upgrade to > >> 4.1 soon after disks arrive. > -- #!/usr/bin/perl if ((not 0 && not 1) != (! 0 && ! 1)) { print "Larry and Tom must smoke some really primo stuff...\n"; }