On Mon, May 21, 2007 at 07:29:45AM +0200, Henning Brauer wrote: > * Uv Pzaf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-05-20 23:12]: > > I wonder why OpenBSD packages (i.e. openldap-server-2.3.24.tgz) still > > uses ldbm as database backend especially since the OpenLDAP folks are > > stating that this is no good any more: > > (http://www.openldap.org/faq/data/cache/756.htm) and not bdb or hdb. > > because ldbm works fine, very much opposed to the other two you mention.
This is not entirely true. I know for a fact mcbride@ has run into some serious problems with ldbm and openldap in -current. Something about it just completely losing one out of a every 150 queries. Switching to the stable version of OpenLDAP and bdb solved his problem. -- Mathieu Sauve-Frankel
