On Mon, 28 May 2007, Edd Barrett wrote:
On 28/05/07, Otto Moerbeek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
But now the excutable starts.... so you can see with ktrace which
syscall is not implemented.
4362 ktrace RET ktrace 0
4362 ktrace CALL execve(0xcfbe1d1b,0xcfbe1bdc,0xcfbe1be4)
4362 ktrace NAMI "./a.out"
4362 a.out EMUL "linux"
4362 a.out RET oldolduname 0
4362 a.out CALL uname(0xcfbe4e66)
4362 a.out RET uname 0
4362 a.out CALL brk(0)
4362 a.out RET brk 135491584/0x8137000
4362 a.out CALL brk(0x8137c70)
4362 a.out RET brk 135494768/0x8137c70
4362 a.out CALL #243 (unimplemented linux_sys_set_thread_area)()
4362 a.out PSIG SIGSYS SIG_DFL code 0
4362 a.out NAMI "a.out.core"
Something to do with threading?
my quick and dirty Google search brought this
http://www.mail-archive.com/misc@openbsd.org/msg37150.html
