* Toni Mueller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-08-06 15:30]: > Hi Ronnie, > > On Mon, 06.08.2007 at 00:14:17 +0200, Ronnie Garcia <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I was observing this behiviour you are describing until yesterday, when > > i re-installed my two border routers to 4.1, then updated to 4.1-stable. > > hmmm... all affected machines on my side are 4.1-stable as of May 24th. > > > My two borders have now the full tables from each other (iBGP), plus the > > full route from the peer it's attached to (eBGP). > > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~# bgpctl sh sum > > > > > > Neighbor AS MsgRcvd MsgSent OutQ Up/Down > > State/PrefixRcvd > > TRANSIT-1 XXXX1 99584 1212 0 20:09:29 222366 > > IBGP XXXX7 91488 96015 0 20:09:29 223170 > > This I saw before the route flap. But perhaps I'll tour the CVS logs to > find out whether something was changed. > > > This is not a problem for me, but i had to let you know > > Yes, thank you!
please go read claudio's explanation again. the behaviour you see is 100% correct, mandated by the RFCs and no sign of a problem at all. -- Henning Brauer, [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] BS Web Services, http://bsws.de Full-Service ISP - Secure Hosting, Mail and DNS Services Dedicated Servers, Rootservers, Application Hosting - Hamburg & Amsterdam
