On Mon, Aug 20, 2007 at 12:37:03PM +0200, Toni Mueller wrote: > Hi, > > in my network, I have five OSPF routers and hosts which learn their routes via > OSPF, all in one area. One of the routers is a Cisco, all other affected > routers and hosts are OpenBSD/i386 4.1-stable as of May 24th. The problem is > that some machines establish an adjacency with some, but not all machines in > that area. > > > On 192.168.50.4: > > $ ospfctl show nei > ID Pri State DeadTime Address Iface Uptime > 10.0.0.2 5 FULL/OTHER 00:00:37 192.168.50.2 fxp0 00:19:04 > 10.0.0.5 50 FULL/OTHER 00:00:37 192.168.50.5 fxp0 01w5d17h > 10.0.0.6 50 FULL/DR 00:00:33 192.168.50.6 fxp0 01w5d17h > 10.0.0.3 5 FULL/OTHER 00:00:34 192.168.50.3 fxp0 02w2d12h > 10.0.0.1 10 FULL/OTHER 00:00:34 192.168.50.1 fxp0 01w6d21h > > > On 192.168.50.3: > > $ ospfctl show nei > ID Pri State DeadTime Address Iface Uptime > 10.0.0.2 5 2-WAY/OTHER 00:00:31 192.168.50.2 fxp1 - > 10.0.0.5 50 2-WAY/OTHER 00:00:31 192.168.50.5 fxp1 - > 10.0.0.6 50 FULL/DR 00:00:38 192.168.50.6 fxp1 01w5d17h > 10.0.0.1 10 2-WAY/OTHER 00:00:39 192.168.50.1 fxp1 - > 10.0.0.4 50 FULL/BCKUP 00:00:39 192.168.50.4 fxp1 02w2d12h > > > On 192.168.50.2: > > $ ospfctl show nei > ID Pri State DeadTime Address Iface Uptime > 10.0.0.5 50 2-WAY/OTHER 00:00:32 192.168.50.5 dc2 - > 10.0.0.1 10 2-WAY/OTHER 00:00:30 192.168.50.1 dc2 - > 10.0.0.4 50 FULL/BCKUP 00:00:39 192.168.50.4 dc2 00:19:04 > 10.0.0.3 5 2-WAY/OTHER 00:00:39 192.168.50.3 dc2 - > 10.0.0.6 50 FULL/DR 00:00:38 192.168.50.6 dc2 00:19:04 > > > The router 192.168.50.1 is the Cisco machine. > > Restarting the ospfd on one or the other machine has no effect I could > determine so far. > > > Any ideas are most welcome! >
This is perfectly fine. Only the DR and BDR routers 10.0.0.6 and 10.0.0.4 will have full connections with all other routers. All others (state OTHER) will remain in 2-WAY (as in we have to way communication but we do not send each other messages). -- :wq Claudio
