On 9/14/07, Rui Miguel Silva Seabra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Fri, Sep 14, 2007 at 02:29:44PM +0200, Paul de Weerd wrote: > > On Fri, Sep 14, 2007 at 12:24:25PM +0100, Rui Miguel Silva Seabra wrote: > > | > On 2007-09-14 11:13:11, Rui Miguel Silva Seabra wrote: > > | > > > > | > > The spirit of the GNU GPL is to maintain freedom for all users. > > | > > > | > You don't seem to get the fact that the BSD license is *more free* > > | > than the GPL because the BSD license imposes *fewer requirements* > > | > on distribution. > > | > > | You don't seem to get the fact that I'm not even talking about what's > > | more or less free (in your definition). The BSD has fewer requirements, > > | but it allows some users to not have the freedoms you claim to defend. > > > > And no, it does not. > > I'd love to see how an user who gets a modified binary version has the > freedom to modify it. Go ahead. Prove me that it doesn't allow some users > to loose freedom... >
Ability and freedom are not synonyms. I don't understand why you GPL folks need to change the meanings of words to get your points across. Greg -- Ticketmaster and Ticketweb suck, but everyone knows that: http://ticketmastersucks.org Dethink to survive - Mclusky
