>     Also modern CPUs run microcode.  Does this make them "unethical"?
> 
> Not in my view.  And this is why:
> 
>     > Whether it runs on a computer or an FPGA, either way it's a program.
>     > So the next crucial question is, do users normally install programs on
>     > that device?
> 
> If users don't normally install microcode in the CPU, then ethically
> it may as well be a circuit.  It is not built as a circuit, but that's
> a different question.

So why did you create gplv3?  isn't that just another circuit that
you'll never load software on?

I am sorry but your arguments are circular and not consistent.

Reply via email to