On Sat, Jan 19, 2008 at 08:24:27AM +0100, ropers wrote: > On 19/01/2008, Douglas A. Tutty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> may just be very insecure. Which is it? You can't tell without looking > at the details, or asking somebody who has done so. Your specific > questions to this list about Dillo et al. are quite valid in that > regard, but your generalised question "Is a browser with a long > history of few security bugs more or less secure than a browser with a > long history of many security bugs?" really can't be answered. It > depends. I agree ropers. It seems that nobody has "looked at the details" and nobody who has done so has said so in this thread. I may as well go with Konqueror (for the feel I like) and Firefox (for sites that don't work with Konq) and be done with it. Thanks all. Doug.
