On 2008/01/21 00:31, Sunnz wrote: > So, do I need to use some kind of packet management with tag to get > route-to to work? Or would using reply-to suffice?
Just use reply-to, that's what it's for. > "Opposite direction is only defined in the context of a state entry, > and reply-to is useful only in rules that create state." - as far as I > know of, only TCP connections has states, but not UDP... see pfctl -ss.
