Ok, I should study faq and some mans. Thanks Josh. And other - sorry for the inconvenience.
Jernej On Tue, Apr 15, 2008 at 2:18 PM, Josh Grosse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Jernej: > > AFAIK there was only one provable and admitted case of an exploit of > OpenBSD's > public facing systems, and that was of an ftp server that happened to be > hosting OpenBSD tarballs. And while FAQ 8.18 says that the project's > publicly > available servers at openbsd.org do not run OpenBSD, a compromise of an > openbsd.org platofmr is really not the issue, though it highlights it. > > When you install this OS, it is "secure by default." Wonderful. Making any > configuration changes or adding any software might compromise that security. > This means that security of the software configuration and the hardware > platform are the administrator's responsibility -- mistakes could be made. > In > addition, OpenBSD systems may be compromised (and probably are) for other > reasons than administrator error. Compromise is always possible through > human > behavior -- such as the inadvertent disclosure of passwords or keys, through > "social engineering" scam attacks, etc. > > FYI: Since the inception of OpenBSD, there have been exactly two known remote > exploits found in the OS. That's a pretty decent network-based security > record for a general purpose OS.
