On Fri, 16 May 2008 17:48:47 -0400 Daniel Ouellet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Rico Secada wrote: > > On Fri, 16 May 2008 22:35:00 +0200 > > chefren <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > >> I know at time it was said that OpenBSD is not for everything, but > >> so far, I still haven't find anything that I need that OpenBSD > >> can't shine doing. > > > > I can almost second that except for the few cases in which we really > > need to update stuff without fuzz, then we use Debian. > > All I need and use are in packages and using current and the pkg_add > to updates couldn't be easier and faster. I find it a lots faster and > easier then app_get from Debian, but that's the beauty of it all. You > choose what you feel is right for you. Yes :-) but I was mainly talking about the basesystem and kernel. About it being more easy and more fast than apt-get from Debian, I have yet to witness that :-) > And in some cases, release is just find and it's not liek I need the > latest all the time for each packages either. A properly 6 months > fresh reinstall on all always provides best results and fix what ever > bugs in between that may happened. > > I still haven't switch some desktop to OpenBSD yet because of some > stupid Microsoft customers requirements, but as far as servers are > concern, hell OpenBSD beat all for me anyway. >140 servers and keep > counting. I couldn't sleep better. > > And I should also say for the desktop there is a little bit of > slacking on my part too, to switch to it. I still haven't find an > easy way to setup window manager as easy as doing servers. but most > likely may be my lack of spending time to learn it as well too.
