On Wed, 16 Jul 2008, David Collier-Brown wrote: > Morton Harrow wrote: >>> Shouldn't GPL versions follow the bright example of TeX, and thus the >>> next version be 3.1? > > To quote Fred Weigel, they should be > 3 > 3.1 > 3.14 > 3.141 > 3.1415 > 3.14159 > > --dave > -- > David Collier-Brown | Always do right. This will gratify > Sun Microsystems, Toronto | some people and astonish the rest > [EMAIL PROTECTED] | -- Mark Twain > (905) 943-1983, cell: (647) 833-9377, (800) 555-9786 x56583 > bridge: (877) 385-4099 code: 506 9191#
Nah. Should be GPL V-infinity That way there won't be any more. Cheers, Dick Johnson Penguin : Linux version 2.6.22.1 on an i686 machine (5588.29 BogoMips). My book : http://www.AbominableFirebug.com/ _ **************************************************************** The information transmitted in this message is confidential and may be privileged. Any review, retransmission, dissemination, or other use of this information by persons or entities other than the intended recipient is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify Analogic Corporation immediately - by replying to this message or by sending an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] - and destroy all copies of this information, including any attachments, without reading or disclosing them. Thank you.
