Hi, On Sun, 20.07.2008 at 21:03:03 +0200, Marc Balmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > * Henning Brauer wrote: > > lighttpd. > > can it do reverse proxying, as needed for zope?
in theory, it can, but I didn't try. My experience from running some low-traffic sites with both nginx and lighttpd is that nginx is by far easier to handle, more robust, and also more flexible in its configuration, and I hope to get rid of lighttpd asap (eg. "my" bugs would linger for months, or longer). The only point where lighttpd imho "shines", sort of, is easier launching of internal FastCGI servers. Do you have any problems running nginx as a reverse proxy for Zope? We do it, and it gives us less trouble than the built-in Apache, I must say (even ignoring the system load). Kind regards, --Toni++
