Stefan Sczekalla escreveu: > Hello Giancarlo, > > Argh - rtfm - I tried to search on this topic but only in the OpenBSD > FAQ. > Thanks for pointig me to the right direction. > > Kind regards, > > Stefan > > -----Original Message----- > From: Giancarlo Razzolini [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of > Giancarlo Razzolini > Sent: Tuesday, September 02, 2008 7:24 PM > To: Stefan Sczekalla > Cc: misc@openbsd.org > Subject: Re: question on nat behaviour .... > > Stefan Sczekalla escreveu: > >> I'm somewhat uncertain on how NAT behaves especially on nearly >> concurrent rules. >> >> e.g. >> >> assumption: ( ext_if has two addresse e.g. 82.100.200.1 and and ALIAS >> 82.100.200.2 ) >> >> nat pass on $ext_if form $internal_networks to 192.168.47.11 -> >> 82.100.200.1 >> nat pass on $ext_if form $internal_networks to any -> ( $ext_if ) >> >> ( how ) Can I bee sure that 192.168.47.11 will always be conncted from >> 82.100.200.1 ? >> >> will PF behave differently when the oder of the rules is vice-versa ? >> >> Kind regards, >> >> Stefan >> >> >> >> Some months ago i would just say: RTFM. But I'm reviewing my concepts. Better someone who is pointed in the right direction, than someone not pointed at all, and unhappy with the system.
My regards, -- Giancarlo Razzolini http://lock.razzolini.adm.br Linux User 172199 Red Hat Certified Engineer no:804006389722501 Verify:https://www.redhat.com/certification/rhce/current/ Moleque Sem Conteudo Numero #002 OpenBSD Stable Ubuntu 8.04 Hardy Heron 4386 2A6F FFD4 4D5F 5842 6EA0 7ABE BBAB 9C0E 6B85
